Injured by 3M Dual Ended Ear Plugs?

You may be eligible for Compensation

The lawsuit includes a complaint that 3M and Aearo Technologies manipulated the test results of the earplugs to meet the government’s product standards. These activities and false claims resulted in damages that 3M has to pay to the U.S. government in this settlement. These damages include the monetary damages directly associated with the cost of the earplugs and also a substantial amount of ongoing medical expenses that are associated to helping veterans who suffer from hearing loss or tinnitus affected by these defective earplugs

Hearing Loss and Tinnitus


Characterized as ringing in the ears.  The volume of the ringing can vary from person to person.  Tinnitus is the most common disability among veterans due to the exposure of being around loud noises such as jets, helicopters, gunfire, explosions and heavy machinery.  The earplugs were suppose to provide protection from loud noises such as these.  But being a defective product, many personnel become very vulnerable to the damages these noises can create.  

Hearing loss can be a long-term or even permanent effect from using the earplugs.  It is reported that Hearing Loss is among the top most medical conditions for military service men and women.  Hearing loss has the potential to be an untreatable condition even when using devices such as hearing aids.

Hearing Loss

You may be eligible for Compensation

Copyright © 2018.  All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy and Disclaimer | Attorney Advertising     Thank you for your visit. is owned and maintained by Principal Law Group, LLP, a law firm with lawyers licensed to practice in Maryland, Washington DC, Delaware, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Through the use of co-counsel and local attorneys, we are able to review all cases nationwide, but not all are accepted. Principal Law Group, LLP may associate with other attorneys acting as lead counsels, at no additional cost to the client. In addition, viewing the content on this website, requesting additional information, or transmitting information through a contact form should never be considered the formation of an attorney-client relationship.